jump over navigation bar
Consulate SealUS Department of State
Consulate General of the United States Hong Kong and Macau - Home flag graphic
U.S. Policies and Issues
 
  Key Government Documents U.S. and China U.S. and Hong Kong U.S. and Macau U.S. and Taiwan U.S. and Asia Policy Issues U.S. Department of State Current Issues

U.S. Relations with the People's Republic of China (2005)

U.S. Wants To Work with Europe in Afghanistan, Elsewhere

State's Fried says U.S., Europe share common goals throughout the world

Following is the transcript of the roundtable discussion:

(begin transcript)

PRESS ROUNDTABLE WITH DANIEL FRIED

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs
U.S. Department of State

November 14, 2005
Berlin, Germany

Transcription (prepared by PA Berlin)

[ ...Intervening Text... ]

Question: Andreas Rinke from Handelsblatt. I want to continue with two other subjects. One is China. Is that a topic you will be talking about as well, because one of the problems between especially Germany, or the German chancellor, and the U.S. was the arms embargo? Since you mentioned that in the coalition treaty there is maybe new wording, partners not counterweight. Is that the attempt of the American government to form a common strategy toward this emerging superpower?

Ambassador Fried: Well, I think in general, the United States and Europe should consult intensively on every strategic question in the world today, and wherever we can we should develop common assessments, and, on the basis of those common assessments, decide how we can act together in common purpose. The United States and Europe together constitute a critical mass of democracy, economic strength and power, but it is based on common values and common purposes. If we have the ability to help advance freedom, security, and prosperity in the world, then we also have the responsibility to do so.

With respect to China, I do not expect that the arms embargo will dominate discussions; I think that quarrel was an unnecessary one because we ended up quarrelling about tactics without having had a common strategic assessment of China and a discussion of our common purposes. And if you have first a strategic discussion and a serious one, then the tactical questions are much easier to resolve because you're proceeding from a common assessment of the issue. We have indeed launched a U.S.-Europe dialogue about Asia, including China; it held its first session in May, its second session was earlier this month. It will continue, and it is very useful. I don't expect my discussions today will be dominated by the arms embargo, because very largely we've put that aside in favor of concentration on the critical issues, which is how can we encourage the develop of China in a responsible direction in the 21st century.

[ ...Intervening Text... ]

(end transcript)

back to top ^

Page Tools:

Printer_icon.gif Print this article

- U.S. Relations With PRC -
State Department (2005)
2005 documents
Archives



 

    This site is managed by the U.S. Department of State.
    External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.


Consulate General of the United States